Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. — From 25Hz to 1kHz the response is anything but linear and peaks around 200Hz at +10dB. As a serious music lover you don’t want to forego your passion for whatever reason. 2. highest frequency. Below the effect of the filter to the modified driver. HD 569 has a range of 10 Hz - 28 kHz and its frequency response is balanced and smooth, while the model HD 599 works in a range 12 Hz - 38 kHz. Max. Below the CSD (waterfall) plot of the HD559 . To reach impressive levels it needs a bit more voltage than a phone, tablet or USB dongle. For extra-long listening sessions with the great sound of the HD 559. This headphone is overly ‘bassy’ but not as in deep impressive bass but in bloated/fat/hollow/warm bass with subdued highs and a bit coarse mids and no ‘sparkle’. The HD559 is darker sounding than the already too boomy sounding DT880 black Special Edition. Inner Pad dimensions: depth font = 21mm, rear = 28mm, Width = 40mm, height = 70mm, oval shaped Cable entry: single sided, left cup. In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! Perfect seal, seal broken with a thick arm pair of glasses and seal substantially broken by slightly lifting the bottom of the pads which can occur when not properly seated. 26000Hz. The cups can swivel far enough sideways but the vertical tilt is a bit limited. ALL measurements are made with a good SEAL on a flatbed measurement rig. Sennheiser HD 560S. Back to Graph Database. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. The tonal balance changes when the HD559 is connected to a higher output resistance amplifier. I don’t think they deserve that company. The Sennheiser HD 559 over-ear headphones are designed to give good sound quality without being quite as expensive as the top-of-the-range models. ). The Sennheiser HD 559 is a decent headphone at a competitive price. plus applicable sales tax – free shipping. Enjoy music through headphones on a low budget. Bass is well extended and rolls off very gently below 25Hz. Its very low weight contributes to this as well and ensures one can do longer listening sessions with it. Below the HD559 versus the well DT990-250 This basically is a CSD (Waterfall) plot but viewed from above where the level differences are colour coded instead of being in the vertical axis. (website links), Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 1) – General Setup, Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 2) – Playing DSD – New SACD plugin (0.9.x and 1.x.x Series), power, efficiency, levels, balanced, impedance. Below the frequency response with the mods and filter versus the stock HD559 Info here. Powered by Sennheiser proprietary transducer technology and featuring the “Ergonomic Acoustic Refinement” (E.A.R) design, the HD 559 provides the first step into the world of audiophile sound reproduction. Max. It is stuck on the magnet and makes the air hole in the driver magnet smaller so air can pass through it with more restriction. Sennheiser HD559. Powered by Sennheiser’s proprietary transducer technology including the “Ergonomic acoustic refinement” (E.A.R.) Digitize your AV management workflow. The tonal balance changes when the HD559 is connected to a higher output resistance amplifier. Those that have their ear touch the driver and are annoyed by it in the HD6xx series may be pleased to hear there is more depth in the HD559. Back to Graph Database. The Sennheiser HD range is home to some legendary headphones – the HD 650 and HD 800 are two of the most praised sets in the world, and now they have a new-born brother. What is the difference between Sennheiser HD 558 and Sennheiser HD 559? The 3m long cable is connected via a locking 2.5mm TRRS connector and has a 6.3mm TRS plug on the other end. Choose language The solution for this is to use a simple electronic filter that only addresses the elevated area. Efficiency: 102dB/1mW (115dB/1V), the data sheet mentions 108dB/V@1kHz A substantially broken seal will result in less subbass but the bass ‘hump’ will not be affected much. Get the latest edition of the legendary Sennheiser sound with these brilliant headphones. If one has very big ears the triangle (for the cup swivel parts) might be an issue. The brand new $249 HD 599 is no exception to this trend, though as always, the devil is in the details. : 121 dB The HD … The HD 439's have a frequency response of 17Hz to 22,500Hz, 32Ohm impedance, 40mm Neodymium drivers and a max SPL (sound pressure level) of 112 dB. Also the frequency range of the spectrum plot is wider (from 100Hz instead of 500Hz). The headband is soft and comfortable and so are the velours pads. This requires removing the pads and removing 3 screws on the edge of the baffle. To compensate for this the amplifier is cranked up to the same level (. © 2020 Sennheiser electronic GmbH & Co. KG | USA. One does NOT have to worry about seal being essential for excellent bass extension. Powered by Sennheiser proprietary transducer technology, these comfortable and attractively designed headphones are the key to unlock the true potential of your home entertainment system. This is a lightweight headphone that feels a bit cheap. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. Final Word. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. Still, the depth is 25mm and thus more than 21. Advertising enquiries. Powered by Sennheiser’s proprietary transducer technology including the “Ergonomic acoustic refinement” (E.A.R.) The actual 2nd harmonic distortion above 1kHz may well be lower than 0.2% . The time span is also bigger in the spectrum plots and expired time is shown from below to top where in the CSD the time is shown from rear to front. The DT990 also has an emphasis in the lows (U shaped sound) but is lower in frequency so less boomy and not hollow. A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. Treble is a bit subdued but present with a sharpish ‘edge’ to it and lacks in nuances and ‘air’. Instead of showing impedance plots, which are hard to ‘read’ when it comes to assessing the tonal balance change in the real world, the HD559 is measured via a few different resistance outputs (0.2Ω, 10Ω, 33Ω and 120Ω). The peaking shows the lower mids are emphasized and bass extension is not that good because of this upper-bass-lower mids boost. sennheiser-hd-558; post-10912087. Below the step response plot which, when the sound is balanced and well extended should show a rise to around 0dB, (indicating fast driver response) and should be slightly sloping downwards indicating bass extension. The HD 200 Pro is b ased on the older HD 400 series refresh from 2015. The picture on the right also shows a (self-adhesive) felt furniture pad with a 3mm hole punched out in the middle. Sample 2 (w/ fresh pads) Sample 2 (w/ worn pads) Sample 1 (w/ worn pads) Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. The HD559 should be driven from 0.1 to 10Ω output resistance amplifiers. For extra-long listening sessions with the great sound of the HD 559. Below the frequency response of the HD 559 (Left, Right). The channel matching is good, but that’s about all that is good about it alas. The impedance of Sennheiser HD 599 is 50 Ohm and this is more than twice higher than the rate of Sennheiser HD 569 — 23 Ohm. Below the step response. While somewhat lacking in the high mids and high highs, the overall impression is one of general quality. On the right the front of the driver (for those interested). The Sennheiser HD 200 Pro launched last year, as a new member of Sennheiser’s vaunted Pro lineup of monitoring headphones. 2. highest frequency. With these mods (+ filter) the sound is much more balanced and much closer and even better than the HD599. voltage: 2.5Vrms (7Vpp) At the top of this page there is a plot showing sound descriptions and when you look at the 20 Hz to 1kHz range you will notice the following descriptors: fat, muddy, cuppy, honky, hollow and indeed all apply. The overly warm midrange from the HD559 is substantial. In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! The same pads are used on the (much better sounding) HD560S. In fact it is better not to remove the dust cover. back to measurements The plot above shows the level differences between the signal (upper trace around 85dB SPL) and the harmonics. Do this mod only if you find the headphone way too warm/bassy/bloated and at your own risk. Frequency response of the modified and filtered HD559 (Left, Right). power rating: 0.1W On a higher output resistance amplifier the output level will be lower of course due to voltage division. For free and easy to use. Of course you also get the DT 880 Pro headphone. The clamping force is ‘medium’ so it won’t move around on the head easily. For example, digital camera companies reserve functions (like RAW output, exposure and white balance bracketing, long exposures, etc.) The resonance frequency is around 100Hz resulting in a warmer and fatter/more bloated sound. Stock HD559 (all holes open), 2 holes shut, 4 holes shut, 4 holes + center hole 4mm and 4 holes + center hole 3mm. To perform the mods the black cloth (dust cover made of fabric) does not have to be removed. Below the distortion measurements of the HD559 (Right channel). below the schematic of this filter for the DIYers. The closed HD 569 with around ear design brings a flexible option to the Home entertainment space. A different plot is the spectrum plot. The headband can be extended over a good range so it is possible to get a good fit with larger heads as well. The HD6xx series has about 21mm depth in the front and rear side where the HD559 has 21mm in the front and 28mm in the back (where it counts). Most people prefer to see percentages instead of level differences so below the exact same plot except ‘normalised’ to the actual signal and level differences given in percentages. Weight: 240 g. (excl. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. Cable: 3m terminated in 6.3mm TRS jack. It is time to listen to all that your home entertainment system has to offer. Below some tests with the holes to see how much damping is needed to flatten the response. DT 880 Pro The DT 880 headphone has a fixed 9.8ft cable and comes with a soft carrying case. Driver size: 38mm (36mm membrane), angled 9° Sennheiser HD 559. 14- 26,000 Hz Downloads. The hump in the lower mids that makes the HD559 sound bloated/hollow/muddy is masking the treble. Cyber Monday dealsView deals. The time span is also bigger in the spectrum plots and expired time is shown from below to top where in the CSD the time is shown from rear to front. Only the HD518 is cheaper. This too is reversible and one can play with different hole sizes and or closing of only 2 or 3 holes to tune the sound to your taste. Most measurement sites have some smoothing applied which ‘irons flat’ sharp peaks and ‘wiggles’. These headphones showed about 6dB of deviation in bass delivery across our 5 human subjects. Digital workflows for flawless daily business. It will give you an excellent sound experience with a satisfying deep and contoured bass. frequency response graphs, CSD waterfall plots, subjective gear reviews. The sound is now full, well extended, clear with smooth mids and pleasant soft well extended treble. Of course it not difficult to change the damping. Search. The frequency response consistency of the HD 201 is mediocre. The new Sennheiser HD 300 Pro bears a distinct resemblance to the HD 280s, yet is a better design and twice the price. A horizontal line shows audible neutral response in the plots on this website. Driver type: dynamic Seal can be an issue with closed-back headphones but is usually less of a problem for open headphones. Collapsible: No The sound quality is far from ‘neutral’. The resonance frequency is around 100Hz resulting in a warmer and fatter/more bloated sound. Indeed one can make the centre hole even smaller and flatten the response even more but this will give too much air restriction leading to higher distortion. This explains the slightly punchier, tighter response by contrast, and the differences in the treble frequency/highs. Sennheiser is proud to partner with ID.me to offer these heroes up to 30% off our premium audio solutions. design, which channels the audio signal directly into your ears. Sep 26, 2014. back to Sennheiser Discover the key facts and see how Sennheiser HD 559 performs in the headphones ranking. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass. Clamping force: medium. HD 559 The Sennheiser HD 559 comes with the headphone and a detachable 9.9ft (3m) cable with 1/4″ (6.33m) connector for pro-audio gear and mixers. The plot shows some lingering in the lows and around 700Hz but no problems in the higher frequencies (aside from 4kHz). Type: Over ear, open As this is a dynamic headphone the frequency response can be amplifier output resistance dependent when certain higher output resistance amplifiers are used. This way the plots are overlaid and it is easier to see how the tonal balance changes. Instead of designing a completely new product to fit a certain price range, large scale manufacturing dictates that it is often cheaper to simply “cripple” an existing high-end product. Frequency band. The HD 555 has a few peaks and troughs in the mid to high range, though, which is a little less than perfect. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Besides, those that bought this headphone having auditioned them may prefer some lows boost so some of it is still there and works very well for the HD559. Categories. The shape of your head, bone structure, pad size, pad ‘softness, (compliance), hair or no hair and or wearing glasses may (drastically) change the frequency response of some headphones, so… your personal experience may differ substantially from these plots. S.P.L. Read more... As successor to our popular HD 500 series, the Sennheiser HD 5 model range offers high quality and value in any aspect. Cyber Monday dealsView deals. Now you can rediscover all of your favorite music. Using the malleable eraser makes this modification easily and fully reversible. The emphasis around 4kHz of the HD559 makes it sound coarser than the treble peak of the DT990 which is higher up. Treble peak of the DT990 is well known. When this headphone came out (nov. 2016) it sold for around € 150 but at the end 2020 the street price dropped to around € 80.- This is the cheaper little brother of the HD599. NO SMOOTHING is applied to the shown plots. The velour pads are exchangeable and all black. I would go with the HD 598’s! Below a comparative measurement of the HD559 and its more expensive bigger brother HD599Bass extension is the same. Sennheiser HD 559 - headphones | 506828. Alas, when doing this modification the coarse mids/treble is no longer masked and the dip around 1kHz that now came to be makes the mids/lower treble over accentuated and is a bit ‘nasty’ and ‘hard’ sounding. The audible frequency range humans naturally hear is 20 to 20,000Hz, but the Sennheiser HD 449's frequency response is 16-24kHZ, giving you a little extra clarity to add to your music experience. Powered by Sennheiser proprietary transducer technology, these comfortable and attractively designed headphones are the key to unlock the true potential of your home entertainment system. The Sennheiser HD 559 is an open over-ear headphone. Sennheiser HD 559 ⭐ review. In the middle the 4 holes are covered. It has a boomy and hollow sound with coarse/grainy upper mids and is lacking in ‘air’. Between 20Hz and 1kHz the HD559 has a lot more emphasis than the better sounding HD599. Below the HD559 versus the DT880 Black Special Edition Distortion levels in the lowest frequencies are 3rd harmonic dominated pointing to compression alike distortion. Sennheiser HD 559 - headphones Specs & Prices. While the retail price might be high, if you go to sites like Amazon, you’re sure to get them for much lower rates as they constantly have some discount or the other going on. It’s still a circumaural closed-back model with a stated frequency response of 6Hz-25kHz and an easily-driven impedance of 64Ω. This is significant and noticeable, however, their treble delivery is decently consistent. A shortcoming of my measurement rig. The Sennhesier HD 555 has a fairly smooth frequency response, which is what we look for in a pair of headphones; big peaks or troughs in the frequency response would mean certain frequencies are being overly exaggerated or suppressed. Sennheiser HD599 Frequency Response Cost. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass. To compensate for this the amplifier is cranked up to the same level (10dB for 120Ω at 1kHz in this case). This is described HERE in more detail. The most remarkable distinction is in their sensitivity, as Audio-Technica ATH-M40x has 98 dB, while Sennheiser HD 559 has 108 dB. Those that know how to solder litz wire can shorten the cable or turn it into a balanced cable. Only above 150Hz distortion drops below 1% which is kind of high. design, which channels the audio signal directly into your ears. Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. The frequency response is a bit different. Featuring a contemporary design that is both attractive and ergonomic. What can be seen though is a small and short lived resonance at around 4kHz which I don’t think is audible because it is short and in the frequency range where the ear itself also has ringing by itself. Its sound will be disappointing for those looking for ‘realistic’ sound with good clarity. Usage: Home, studio, transportable. The open around ear headphones HD 559 is the ideal choice for listeners seeking an optimal blend of all-round performance and quality for home entertainment. The bass hump is considerable lowered. Below a picture of the driver with the pads removed. Max. The ear cups also have some minor changes, with more metal around the cups but a cheaper plastic grill when compared to the HD … 26000Hz. Max. The offensive area (1kHz-10kHz) is effectively lowered while leaving the treble extension untouched. This way the manufacturer can use existing molds, parts, assembly lines and training, etc. Breaking the seal (improper fit on the head) usually means a loss of (sub)bass. Headphone cup connector: Sennheiser locking 2.5mm TRRS jack On a higher output resistance amplifier the output level will be lower of course due to voltage division. The evolution of the original irreverent and irrelevant and non-authoritative site for headphone measurements, i.e. The different tonality from the slightly lower priced HD559 compared to the DT880 BSE is obvious. From 25Hz to 1kHz the response is anything but linear and peaks around 200Hz at +10dB. One thing that continues to stick in my craw, however, is the lack of a 1/4’’ to 3.5 mm stereo adapter. The big, soft detachable ear pads of the HD 559 and its broad padded headband are every bit as comfortable as they look. The HD 559 model has a detachable 10' cable with a 1/4" (6.3mm) plug. The HD559 is a relatively cheap home usage headphone in the HD5xx range. At least from a ‘hi-fi’ standpoint. Also the 2nd harmonic distortion is still quite high up to 1kHz. On the picture below the modifications are shown. This indicates that this headphone is primarily intended for home/desktop usage. The 4 holes and the rather big magnet hole simply are severely under-damping the driver resulting in the wide resonance around 100-200Hz. Treble response from 4kHz is a bit higher and less refined than the HD559. Bass is well extended and rolls off very gently below 25Hz. The 558’s go from 15 – 28,000 Hz. (Left and Right are overlaid), No big red flags here. Aside from a small correction of the microphone itself also some correction in the lowest frequencies is applied to the plots to compensate for the perceived loss of bass when using headphones. The Sennheiser HD 599 do not change much design-wise from the HD 598. Also the frequency range of the spectrum plot is wider (from 100Hz instead of 500Hz). Note: I bought this headphone second hand. Subjectivist, Objectivist or Inbetweenivist ? This basically is a CSD (Waterfall) plot but viewed from above where the level differences are colour coded instead of being in the vertical axis. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. At least from a ‘hi-fi’ standpoint. Note that only doing the driver mod but not using the filter will make the HD559 way too clear/forward/hard and a bit coarse sounding. Internally the cable is 4-wire construction litz wire and the return signals are combined in the 6.3mm TRS plug. The ‘dark’ tonal balance is obvious as the rising edge doesn’t reach 0dB but -6dB. On the left the rear of the driver. Advertising enquiries. The frequency response of the second device is a bit wider since it has a range of 14 Hz - 26 kHz, which is more than the Audio-Technica model has — … A second wide elevation between 1kHz and 10kHz is responsible for the coarseness and sharpish upper mids/treble. . The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. This takes modifications and the obligated filter though. As can be seen the rising edge is now reaching 0dB, there is still some ‘warmth’ and bass extension is much improved because of the more linear response. Mids are overly warm/hollow and sound a bit distant and coarse. The headband has been slightly improved with a better padding and a more premium look and feel. There is a reasonable difference in cost too. The open back HD 599 delivers impressively natural spatial performance. Sennheiser HD 599 costs a bit more than HD 559. Output resistances between the mentioned resistance values will result in tonal changes between those traces. cable) Thread Starter Post #1 of 10 ... have pretty much flat Frequency v/s Impedance curve, where as HD 558 has a bell like curve peaking all the way up ... otherwise they'd be much quieter and this would be obvious on the frequency response graphs… Those that like to modify headphones and like to tinker will find the headphone responds well to this and can be turned from a poor sounding and overpriced headphone into a quite well sounding headphone with a full bodied and well extended bass and pleasant mids with a good resolution. Below the spectrum plot of the HD559 (Right channel). The cable is slightly microphonic so in quiet passages and silences the cable rubbing against clothes is audible in the left cup. Sennheiser HD650. Features. Treble peak of the DT880 is higher but because the elevated bass is masking this a bit the DT880 is better sounding in the treble. Meet the Sennheiser HD 559 The HD 559 is a headphone for those seeking exceptional value. They might not be wireless or have noise cancelling, but that won't hold these headphones back if their sound quality is up to scratch. The cable is a bit microphonic but replaceable. Sennheiser headphones have long been characterized by an overall darker sound – with plenty of emphasis on the low end, while the mids and highs often vary from one model to the next. The HD 449s are able to have loud output thanks to a sensitivity rating of 114 decibels, which is high among comparable headsets. As this is a dynamic headphone the frequency response can be amplifier output resistance dependent when certain higher output resistance amplifiers are used. It comes with a 3m detachable cable and has a 6.3mm plug. The peaking itself thus is more audible than the ringing. This is because of way too much damping and probably done on purpose to justify the price difference from the HD559. In electronic products, firmware is usually crippled to omit/hide certain features.
2020 sennheiser hd 559 frequency response graph